Should you choose GPT-3.5 or GPT-4?

We help you decide which model is more compatible with your company’s needs. We drill the comparison down to lightweight haste (GPT-3.5) versus slower, well-thought-out deliberation (GPT-4).
The Springbok artificial intelligence glossary

We have put together a free glossary with the 34 most common terms you’ll inevitably come across when you explore AI solutions.
Digital dining with a chatbot: AI hits the hospitality industry

A robot in a waiter uniform whizzing to your table might not be the future of hospitality, but some well-placed digitisation is due. In this article, we bring you up to speed about how generative AI is levelling up the hospitality industry, focusing on restaurants.
Data privacy: are law firms safe in the hands of the ChatGPT API?

This article discusses the implications for Personal Identifiable Information (PII) and privileged information. Then, we cover how building a bespoke program, plugged into the API, can alleviate data privacy concerns.
Why ChatGPT triumphs over keyword search document management systems

This article dives into how ChatGPT will clinch a victory over keyword search, which is still the dominating way to sift through document management systems (DMS).
Google Bard vs Microsoft and ChatGPT: the race to LLM-ify the search engine

Below, we share our assessment of the rivalry between ChatGPT and Google Bard. This includes an analysis of the underlying models: GPT3 versus LaMDA.
Jailbreaking, cyberattacks, and ethical red lines: ChatGPT’s risks, and how a human-in-the-loop helps

Below, we share our assessment of some anticipated risks of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT: “jailbreaking” content filters, and weaponisation through copycat technology and cyberattacks. We explain why a human-in-the-loop (HITL) thus remains necessary.
Springbok AI response to the US Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights

On the 4th of October, US President Joe Biden’s White House published the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights. With this, Biden hopes to pave the way for guarding against powerful technologies we have created, emulating the US Bill of Rights adopted in 1791.